An outsider's view of the `gemini://` protocol

[Bradley D. Thornton]

On 3/1/2020 12:22 AM, Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
> 
> 

> 
> Well, section 1.3.2 of the Gemini spec-spec says two digit codes, but
> single (first digit) is all that is required. So, a 2, a 20, and a 21
> are all success and there's no ambituity as to anything occuring at the
> first digit level, it's just more gravy with the second digit.

Errata: There's no '2', the first character is followed by a zero on the
most basic implementations. My bad.

But we still don't have a Gemini status code analagous to that of the
HTTP 418 - and IMNSHO, we should :P

>

-- 
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
http://NorthTech.US
TEL: +1.310.421.8268