Proposed minor spec changes, for comment.

Luke Emmet luke.emmet at gmail.com
Fri May 22 17:13:33 BST 2020


On 22-May-2020 17:07, solderpunk wrote:
> Thanks, everybody, for your thoughts on this matter!  I've made a
> decision
>
> <snip>
>
> This solves the ambiguity of the spec on this matter, and should involve
> very little actual work from anybody to attain/retain compliance - which
> is exactly how it should be, given that everything is already working
> just fine despite the ambiguity.  In particular, given the complete lack
> of modern systems using anything other than LF or CRLF, server munging
> should not be necessary and Gemini content can be served as verbatim
> binary data from the filesystem, which is a very desirable property

Not that you need my endorsement, but this gets a thankful thumbs up 
from me.

  - Luke


More information about the Gemini mailing list