GUS database (was: Re: Ambiguity in unordered list item definition)
Hannu Hartikainen
hannu.hartikainen+gemini at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 11:00:35 BST 2020
Just a thought: it would be great if the GUS database was openly available
(for protocol development purposes, at least). With the current amount of
content you could just grep through everything to see if anybody is using
`*listitem` syntax (my guess: no).
Of course with this amount of content everybody could just crawl everything
themselves, but that can't be good etiquette.
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50, solderpunk <solderpunk at sdf.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:12:47PM +1000, Thomas Karpiniec wrote:
>
> > Oops, that's what I meant in the first place! Unfortunately I too was
> > ambiguous. I didn't realise in the subsequent discussion that I was
> > misunderstood.
> >
> > So to restate it clearly, what I was trying to propose was changing
> > bullets from a line starting with "*" to a line starting with "* ".
>
> Oh, great!
>
> Does anybody *not* like this idea?
>
> Cheers,
> Solderpunk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200601/6bf27c16/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gemini
mailing list