A client SHOULD NOT send the fragment part of a URL to the server?

[James Tomasino]

On 6/9/20 8:12 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
> Perhaps. How would that work?
> 
> => gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.gmi#5.4+Core+line+types
> vs.
> => gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/specification.gmi
> 
> With the first link, a client could indeed scroll to the relevant header, if so inclined.
> 
> How does the second scenario works?

Wouldn't it be infinitely easier and less vague to just use a line
number for the fragment? Everything else is line based, so it fits that
mindset well. It's also less likely to run into issues when someone has
odd characters or multi-character emoji in a heading.