"Wide load" status code(s)?

[Matthew Graybosch]

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:35:11 +0000
solderpunk <solderpunk at SDF.ORG> wrote:

> These measures will bump heads with Petite Abeille's point about TLS
> fingerprinting and how it's good, from an anti-censorship point of
> view, to blend in with the crowd by not using "unusual" certificates.

Not to disparage Petite Abeille's point about TLS fingerprinting and
blending in to avoid notice, but aren't we sticking out anyway by
listening on port 1965?

This is a bit outside my expertise, but wouldn't an adversary
determined to find gemini servers just have to do a port scan?

-- 
Matthew Graybosch		gemini://starbreaker.org
#include <disclaimer.h>		gemini://demifiend.org
https://matthewgraybosch.com	gemini://tanelorn.city
"Out of order?! Even in the future nothing works."