Caching and sizes, the explosion of responise codes (was Re: Caching and status codes)
Ali Fardan
raiz at stellarbound.space
Sun Nov 8 16:31:21 GMT 2020
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 16:21:03 +0000
James Tomasino <tomasino at lavabit.com> wrote:
> Again, I'm not sure if caching is involved in it or not, but that's
> the best thing I could come up with as an answer to your question.
This can be done by remembering the offset percentage-wise in the
client for each previous page, however, this could be broken if caching
wasn't involved in case document changes meanwhile, if this is a
compelling reason to have caching, I'd suggest Mallick's method, as it
won't involve any changes to the protocol and it fits the context very
well.
More information about the Gemini
mailing list