Spec freeze

[Ali Fardan]

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:50:29 +0100
Bj?rn W?rmedal <bjorn.warmedal at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. There are parts of the specification that need clarification. I.e.
> the "Empty META" question a short while back. I would much rather see
> an engaged discussion about finding and clarifying ambiguity in the
> protocol specification than suggestions of new features, honestly. I
> think that's where the large gains are to be made.

As far as I can remember if my memory serves me right, solderpunk said
he'd update the spec for that, this is an acceptable change.

This and the TLS related proposals.