SPOOFED: Regarding non-finite response bodies

[James Tomasino]

On 11/16/20 11:01 PM, Drew DeVault wrote:
> I disagree very strongly with the suggestion of gemini+stream://. It
> relies upon a presumption about the specification which is poorly
> supported: that all Gemini requests are finite.

As the original author of the gemini+stream proposal I want to just jump in with my agreement of Drew's response. Everything I had stated was based on my *incorrect* assumption that the spec was clear that our connection ended before processing data. If that is not the case then any and all Gemini clients can support streaming and we have no need for a +stream add-on.

Hooray for streaming!

> Do not.
> Extend.
> Gemini.

Agreed.