Gemini Newsgroup RFD

[Nathan Galt]

> On Oct 3, 2021, at 10:09 PM, Plain Text <text at sdfeu.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 11:54:39 +0100, Oliver Simmons wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 00:16, Plain Text <text at sdfeu.org> wrote:
>>> merged group for c.i.gopher and c.i.gemini – but lacking a … name
>> 
>> "Small-web" or "small-net" are sometimes used, most often to describe a
>> combination browser for these protocols.
>> There's quite a bit of overlap between the communities.
> 
> Thanks, so true! And so I began to write an RFD document for "Small Scale 
> Hypertext Information Systems" in the same pad (carbon copy below):
> https://pads.ccc.de/comp-infosystems-gemini-rfd
> 
> Please, anybody feel free to edit along and/or give other input, also on 
> the name and the byline, and the whole endeavour, of course, as I do not 
> want to diminish the efforts already put into the first RFD process. 

This might be a fantastically premature question, but:

Twitter was once a small Ruby on Rails app. Since “small” is a functional definition, does a protocol get booted out of the group if it becomes too popular?