Gemini on Sourcehut (was Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide (was Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions))

[Omar Polo]

just one thing: before copying the specification text etc I would
probably make sure what the license really is.

AFAICS there's no license, neither in the original text from solderpunk
nor in the rfc draft from Sean, which means that they hold all the
rights on those texts.

IANAL, so maybe what you're doing fells under the fair use, I don't
know, my intention was just to make sure this point was taken into
consideration.

good luck

u9000 <u9000 at posteo.mx> writes:

> So far I have not seen anyone advocating for remaining on Gitlab, and I
> have seen plenty of people advocating for Sourcehut or something
> similarly simple. Additionally, the specification currently has no
> maintainer.
>
> Because of this, I have taken the liberty of creating a project and bug
> trackers on Sourcehut. I will be coping the Gitlab issues and
> repositories today.
>
> => https://sr.ht/~u9000/gemini-specification/ Sourcehut project
>
> As I do not have an abundance of excess time, I would love for someone
> to step-up to fill Sean's role. If needed, however, I can do so.
>
> I hope this move will allow more people to contribute to the project---
> even if they cannot create an account---and rejuvenate the specification
> discussions.