A proposal to freeze the Gemini specification

DJ Chase u9000 at posteo.mx
Tue Oct 26 18:36:43 BST 2021
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 17:17 +0000, Solderpunk wrote:
> On 25.10.2021 23:27, almaember wrote:
> 
> 
> > I believe, that in order to avoid more controversy, incompatibility
> > between implementations, and power struggles, we should freeze the
> > specification permanently.
> 
> Consider it "feature frozen".  There's still some stuff which I think 
> ought to be done.  But I do not anticipate making any changes which 
> could not be fairly classed as "tidying up technical loose ends".  I 
> can't promise nobody will have to change a single line of code in their 
> clients/servers, but I'm not going to do anything which is going to 
> cause widespread substantial breakage.  Ordinary end users probably 
> won't notice anything changing.

Great.

> PS: Don't worry, I've got plenty of gum.

What flavor? /j

-- 
DJ Chase
They, Them, Theirs



Archive home | About this archive