A proposal to freeze the Gemini specification
DJ Chase u9000 at posteo.mx
Tue Oct 26 18:36:43 BST 2021
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 17:17 +0000, Solderpunk wrote:
> On 25.10.2021 23:27, almaember wrote:
>
>
> > I believe, that in order to avoid more controversy, incompatibility
> > between implementations, and power struggles, we should freeze the
> > specification permanently.
>
> Consider it "feature frozen". There's still some stuff which I think
> ought to be done. But I do not anticipate making any changes which
> could not be fairly classed as "tidying up technical loose ends". I
> can't promise nobody will have to change a single line of code in their
> clients/servers, but I'm not going to do anything which is going to
> cause widespread substantial breakage. Ordinary end users probably
> won't notice anything changing.
Great.
> PS: Don't worry, I've got plenty of gum.
What flavor? /j
--
DJ Chase
They, Them, Theirs
Archive home | About this archive