Rethinking the link line
The Gnuserland gnuserland at mailbox.org
Wed Nov 3 20:04:43 GMT 2021
OH my... ^_____^"
As I stated, I arrived late here , I missed a lot of important conversations.
I wrote because I'd like to contribute and I laughed to your sarcasm however never pretended to be right, I just asked.
Cheers,
TGL
> It was thus said that the Great The Gnuserland once stated:
>> Today the specs define:
>>
>> =>
>>
>> to provide links for every protocols your client and the capsule server
>> can handle, if for instance you client is able to handle some of the
>> content delivered it will be likely to be display in a line.
>>
>> I suggest to also to add a second flavor:
>>
>> <=
> Today you are proposing to define '<='. Yesterday, there was a proposal
> to define '<=' for inputing of form data:
>
> https://mailing-list-archive.gemi.dev/www/2021/004944.html
>
> Today you are proposing to define '<='. Yesterday, there was a proposal
> to define '<=' for inputing of form data:
>
> https://mailing-list-archive.gemi.dev/www/2021/004944.html
>
> Tomarrow? Who knows? Expect more bikeshedding.
>
> -spc
Archive home | About this archive