[Users] Bug in the gemtext documentation?

Stephane Bortzmeyer stephane at sources.org
Mon Dec 21 08:25:27 GMT 2020


On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:28:00PM -0500,
 Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 25 lines which said:

> Immediately below that line in the spec:
> 
> "Square brackets indicate that the enclosed content is optional."

You're right, I've read the spec too quickly. Thanks.

Why not using a BNF like ABNF (RFC 5234) in the spec, so we have a
formal grammar?

gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/rfc-mirror/rfc5234.txt



More information about the Gemini mailing list