[Users] Bug in the gemtext documentation?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
stephane at sources.org
Mon Dec 21 08:25:27 GMT 2020
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 01:28:00PM -0500,
Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> Immediately below that line in the spec:
>
> "Square brackets indicate that the enclosed content is optional."
You're right, I've read the spec too quickly. Thanks.
Why not using a BNF like ABNF (RFC 5234) in the spec, so we have a
formal grammar?
gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/rfc-mirror/rfc5234.txt
More information about the Gemini
mailing list